Why fire insurance claims are denied by insurers

You purchase fire insurance to protect yourself from fires and smoke damage.  Sadly, insurance companies do deny fire insurance claims. If your fire claim is denied, you will ask yourself, “Why would my insurance company deny my fire insurance claim?”.  Insurance companies use several excuses to try to get out of paying fire claims.

Fraudulently Alleging Fraud

One technique used by insurance companies to deny claims (including fire claims) is to accuse you of insurance fraud.  Your insurance company may use obscure phrasing when describing the details of your property damage, such as not being able to determine the origin of the fire, suggesting accomplices and scenarios you staged to defraud the insurance company, and suggesting you are lying or concealing the truth.

Asinine Allegations of Arson

Insurance companies love to accuse their insureds of arson, even if the local fire department rules out arson.  Obviously, if you set the fire, then your claim will be rightfully denied, but the general public would be shocked at the number of times an insurance company accuses its insured of arson with zero proof.  Even if the insurance company eventually pays the claim, they love to use the “arson card” to substantially delay payment of the claims (repeatedly telling you that the fire is “still under investigation).

The burden of proof lies with the insurance company when it comes to proving arson.  They cannot deny your insurance claim based on speculation alone. Without proof, when an insurance company denies an insurance claim, they do so in bad faith.  The bad faith is obvious when the local fire marshal does not find arson, and the insurance company still accuses you of arson.

Poor Documentation Practices

The problem with a fire is that what the fire doesn’t destroy, the water from the fire department does.  If you cannot document your personal property (that has been burned to ashes or is so wet it is beyond repair) then you will have a hard time recovering from your insurance company.  With the advent of cameras on cell phones, the following advice is pretty easy for any insured to follow and if you do it, you will be very well prepared to prove your claim after a fire.  Go around your house doing a video inventory of all of your personal property (or at least your most expensive or prized possessions).  Take photos of any receipts or appraisals you have that show the value of the item.  If you store your photos on a cloud then you will always have proof of your lost items.  You should also spend a few hundred dollars on a very good fireproof and waterproof safe.  In the safe, you should store all valuable papers, receipts, appraisals, and anything that will help you prove the value of your personal property.

Unlicensed Electrical

Another way insurance companies try to deny fire claims is by alleging contractor error.  Your insurance company will blame your electrician for faulty wiring.  For these reasons, we cannot stress enough the importance of hiring a licensed, bonded, and insured electrician to do quality work. As a responsible homeowner, you have a duty to maintain and keep your home in good condition.

By having an unlicensed contractor or handyman perform unlicensed or shoddy work on your home’s electrical system, you allow your insurance company the option to deny your insurance claim.

Paying Your Premiums

If you did not make your premium payments on time, then your insurance company can deny your insurance damage claim. Pay premiums on time to prevent your insurer from using your history to get out from paying your insurance claim.

Illegal Activities

Your property insurance claim can be denied if your fire damage is the result of illegal activities. For instance, if you were stealing electricity from your neighbor’s house and your house burns down because of the theft, then the insurance company can deny your insurance claim.

Any number of illegal activities might cause your insurer to deny your claim.

Underpaying & Stalling Claims

Stalling is a tactic insurance companies use you goad policyholders into accepting a lower insurance payout. An insurer can require unreasonable proof, question every facet of your insurance claim, and utilize every conceivable justification to lower or delay a claim settlement.

Conclusion

Through all these possibilities, the insurer might not be operating in good faith. If an insurer doesn’t respond to their policyholders in a timely fashion, that insurer is acting in bad faith. When your insurance company acts in bad faith, call the expert property insurance lawyers at the Chad T. Wilson Law Firm at (833) 942-0678.

Our attorneys work on a contingency basis, meaning if we don’t win your case, we don’t get paid. Maximize your insurance claim settlement with the Chad T. Wilson law firm. No recovery equals no fee.

sweepingout-garage-1024x768-1-min

Texas Underpaid Homeowners Insurance Claim Victory

Do you have an underpaid homeowners insurance claim?

Many insurance companies regard plumbing to be part of routine homeowner maintenance. Maintenance is entirely the property owner’s responsibility. Damage to pipes that develops over time because of lack of maintenance is typically not covered. Pipes in this state could potentially flood an entire house, causing catastrophic damage! Many Insurance agencies will deny or send you away with an underpaid homeowners insurance claim. For an insurance company to cover a broken pipe, the burst must have occurred suddenly and by accident, and should not have been easily preventable. If an ignored leaking pipe suddenly burst, the insurance company’s agents will look for evidence of a long-term leak and will likely deny your claim. Some insurance policies look at the differences in what is referred to as “resulting damage” versus “initial damage”. If water damage resulting from a broken pipe or appliance is addressed in your insurance policy, then you could be compensated for all or some of the damages…even if those damages did not occur instantly. 

When a pipe does burst, homeowners insurance typically covers carpets or rugs, flooring, drywall, and paint in most cases. Any clean-up service may also be included in your coverage. Sadly, the cost of the problem, repairing the busted pipe or replacing the broken appliance is generally not covered.

What Came First? The Foundation Damage Or The Pipe Burst?

In the case of a client of ours out of Montgomery, Texas, the family of three experienced a pipe burst the wall of their garage. The pipe burst leaked sewage onto the garage floor and the resulting odors penetrated the house for a year before the case was resolved. Because the insurance claim was underpaid, the homeowner had little choice but to clean up the mess himself which ultimately lead to him getting E.coli and requiring urgent medical attention. 

Along with the damage to the garage and living with the sewage smell inside their home for a year, our client lost all personal possessions in the garage when it flooded. Their insurance company sent out an adjuster and an engineer to handle the carrier’s side of the insurance claim and both remarked the damage could be from the foundation moving, citing cosmetic repairs which had been made to the foundation’s corners. Our adjuster determined that the damage was indeed sudden and accidental and covered under the homeowner’s insurance policy. This slight on the insurance company’s end made it possible for us to pursue 8 times the initial payout to our client from the insurance company, allowing our client to make the appropriate repairs and get on with life without the smell of sewage in their home.

What Can You Do To Prevent Your Water Damage Claim From Being Denied?

Make sure you have any repairs to your home well documented. Keep any receipts from any professional services that may have worked on your pipes or home. These records can make or break a denied, delayed, or underpaid homeowners insurance claim. Replace pipes that have outlived their structural integrity. Inspectors can find tell-tale evidence of a slow leak and can deny your insurance claim accordingly. Know where the shutoff valve for your home is at in case you need to turn off the water quickly. Make your best effort to prevent your pipes from freezing. Wrap pipes, leave them to drip when appropriate, heat the home, and so on.

Filing A Claim Tips

  • Keep proof that you paid the deductible for your claim. State law allows insurance companies to ask for verification, like a receipt or check stub, that you paid for repairs in the amount of your deductible.
  • Keep your receipts for temporary repairs, but don’t make any permanent repairs until the insurance adjuster authorizes you to do so. Failure to do so may complicate the payment of your claim.
  • Look over your policy. Determine what is covered and what is not and any deductibles there may be. Contact your insurance agent if you are uncertain about your coverage.
  • Document your communication with the insurance company. Record the date, name, and role of each person you speak with and the content of the conversation.
  • Get a second opinion. Get repair bids from other contractors and compare them with the insurance adjuster’s report before resolving your claim.
  • Assert your right to the protection you paid for and be prepared to negotiate for a fair settlement of your claim.
  • Be present during the claim adjusters’ visit so you can point out all of the damage.
  • Document the damage. Photos and videos can strengthen your claim.
  • Be patient. Every insurance company handles claims differently.

Should I Hire An Attorney?

If you have an underpaid homeowners insurance claim and you think your insurance policy covers your loss and your insurer doesn’t, or if you feel the damage you sustained is far more than what your insurance company compensates you for, or if your carrier neglected your claim altogether, then the Texas Insurance Code allows recovery of “actual damages, plus court costs and reasonable attorney’s fees” and if the insurer acted in bad faith you may pursue an award of up to “three times the number of actual damages.”

If you’re unsure of whether or not your situation warrants filing a claim against your homeowner’s insurance company, contact us. Free consultation. No recovery equals no fee.

C-Wilson-COVID-19-shutdown-min

Here’s How to Get Compensation

If your business was harmed by the COVID-19 shutdown, you may be wondering how to get compensated. Unfortunately, there is no one-size-fits-all answer to this question. Every business will have a different experience and will need to approach things differently. In this blog post, we will discuss some of the options that are available to business owners who have been impacted by the pandemic.

Check your Insurance Policy

First and foremost, it is important to check your insurance policy. Many business owners have paid their premiums for years, thinking that they are protected in the case of a pandemic or other disaster. However, insurers are now stalling or denying coverage to many businesses that need it. If you think you may be covered by your insurance policy, it is important to contact your insurer as soon as possible and find out what your options are.

Another option that may be available to you is government assistance. The Small Business Administration (SBA) has created a number of programs to help businesses that have been impacted by the pandemic. If you think you may be eligible for any of these programs, you can find out more information on the SBA website.

Finally, you may also be able to get compensation from your state or local government. Many states and municipalities have set up programs to help businesses that have been impacted by the shutdown. You can find out more information about these programs by contacting your state or local government.

C-Wilson-COVID-19-shutdown-insurance-min

Business Interruption Insurance

If you have business interruption or business income insurance, you may be covered for the COVID-19 shutdown. Even if your policy has an exclusion, coverage may still be possible. The insurance company must demonstrate that an exception is real and applies.

A qualified insurance claims attorney can help you determine if coverage is possible. They will review your policy and help you understand the coverage debate.

If you have business interruption insurance, don’t wait to file a claim. The sooner you file, the sooner you can get the compensation you deserve. Contact a qualified insurance claims attorney today. They will help you navigate the process and get the best possible outcome for your claim.

C Wilson COVID-19 shutdown business interruption insurance policy

Consult with one of our experienced insurance claims attorneys

The first step is to take a look at your policy and see if you have business interruption insurance. This type of insurance is designed to protect businesses from lost income in the event that they are forced to close due to an unforeseen event. If you do have this type of coverage, there will likely be some restrictions and exclusions that apply. However, it is still worth looking into to see if you can make a claim.

The next step is to consult with an experienced insurance claims attorney. They will be able to review your policy and help you determine if you have a valid claim. If you do have a case, they can also assist you in filing the necessary paperwork and representing you in court, if necessary.

There is no guarantee that you will be successful in making a claim for business interruption compensation. However, it is worth exploring all of your options and seeking professional help to give yourself the best chance at getting the money you deserve.

C-Wilson-COVID-19-government-shutdown-1-min

Government COVID-19 Shutdown

Most business insurance policies have a civil authority exclusion that limits or excludes coverage for business income losses caused by an order from civil authority, like a state or local government. So if your policy has this exclusion and you’re forced to shut down due to a government-mandated stay-at-home order, you likely won’t be covered for any resulting business income losses.

However, some policies may have a civil authority coverage endorsement that can provide limited coverage for business income losses in these situations. Whether or not you’re covered will depend on the specifics of your policy, so it’s important to check with your insurance company or broker to see if you have this coverage.

If you don’t have a civil authority exclusion or coverage endorsement in your policy, you may still be covered for business income losses caused by the shutdown. That’s because most policies have a virus exclusion, which excludes coverage for any loss that is directly or indirectly caused by a virus. So if your policy has a virus exclusion and you’re forced to shut down due to a government-mandated stay-at-home order, you likely won’t be covered for any resulting business income losses.

However, some courts have ruled that the virus exclusion does not apply in these circumstances because the shutdown was ordered by the government, not by the presence of the virus itself. So if your policy has a virus exclusion and you’re forced to shut down due to a government-mandated stay-at-home order, you may be able to get coverage for your business income losses.

If your business has been impacted by the COVID-19 shutdown, you may be wondering if you can get compensation from your insurance company. The answer to that question depends on the specific details of your policy.

The bottom line is that whether or not you’re covered for business income losses caused by the COVID-19 shutdown will depend on the specifics of your policy. So if you’re forced to shut down your business, the first thing you should do is check with your insurance company or broker to see if you have coverage.

If you have any questions about your policy or coverage, please contact us and we’ll be happy to help.

Should I make a claim for compensation?

If you are wondering if it is a good idea to make a claim on your insurance policy for business losses due to the COVID-19 shutdown, the answer is yes. Your insurance company should not drop you for making a business loss claim. Your insurer’s risks do not increase because you filed a claim, as this was not caused by you the business owner.

Making a claim is the only way to get compensated for your losses, and it is important to remember that you are not alone in this situation. Many businesses are facing hardship due to the shutdown, and insurance companies are expecting a high volume of claims. The key is to be prepared and have all of the necessary documentation ready when you file your claim.

One way to find out if you have coverage is to contact one of our expert attorneys. We offer free consultations so that you can get the information you need to make a decision about your next steps.

Don’t try to navigate this process on your own. Let us help you get the compensation you deserve. Contact us today to learn more.

Our team of expert attorneys has extensive experience in handling insurance claims and can help you get the compensation you deserve.

mortgage lenders that complicate the insurance

How did we get here?

All homeowner’s insurance policies have a provision that provides that any payments for damages to the dwelling must include the insured’s mortgage company as a payee on the check. The mortgage lender is included on the check to protect the lender and ensure the insured repairs the property (the lender’s collateral).  Issues arise when the insurance company denies or underpays a claim, a lawsuit is filed, and then the lawsuit is settled.

The insurance company will agree to settle the lawsuit for a sum of money in exchange for the insured signing a release that releases the insurance company from all claims, including bad faith, attorney fees, etc.  The settlement is not limited to the cost of repairs.

In the release, the insurance company will say it denies all liability but is only paying the settlement to buy peace.  However, certain insurance companies have recently insisted on paying the settlement with one check that includes the insured’s lender as a payee.  The problem with this situation is that when there is only one check for all of the settlement and it is made payable to the insured, the law firm, and the mortgage company, some mortgage companies refuse to recognize that part of that settlement is for the attorney’s contingent fee.

The attorney will not endorse the check because he or she is not going to get their fee.  The mortgage company will not endorse the check because the mortgage company wants all the money (even the lawyer’s money).  The result is a standoff that delays the insured getting the money to repair the property.

Recently, the Chad T. Wilson Law Firm has been able to combat this process through the Courts by obtaining a judgment that the insurance company must separate out payment for legal fees and expenses from the payment for repairs. [Olson v. Liberty Mutual]

In another case, the mortgage lender did not account for the law firm’s involvement. After many hours speaking with the loss claims department, we learned they did not have a system nor would they make an exception to ensure our interest in the case was protected and compensated, which directly places that burden on the homeowner. Their threshold was $40,000. The client, the lender, and our law firm are all listed on the check.

This mortgage lender wanted us and the client to endorse the check. Then the mortgage lender would deposit the check in their account and disburse $40,000 to the client to start making repairs. Once repairs are completed or proof from a contractor was provided, then the lender has the property inspected to determine if repairs were sufficient. The mortgage lender will issue a supplement payment to the client for additional repairs.

The key issue with all of those checks in this instance is the law firm is not listed as a payee. This creates the very likely scenario where the client receives the check, sees the additional funds, and thinks the law firm has been paid and that this check is money leftover that the client can do with as they please, thinking these funds may be part of mental anguish or the repairs were not as expensive as previously thought.

That puts a law firm in a position where it has not been paid for its services and the client is naive about the disbursement, making it the client’s responsibility to pay for the litigation instead of the lender.

Complicating matters further, if a contractor sees this money from the repairs and the insurance company is not agreeing to any repairs, then the contractor is essentially relying on the original contractor’s or public adjuster’s estimate of repairs. All that settlement money could likely be going to the contractor for repairs.

The alternative is the client has some money left over after repairs and the law firm is left without getting paid. All because the mortgage lender was not upfront about how it disburses funds. To avoid this, the attorney’s fees should be paid at the beginning of the process or front end in alignment with Texas law, “an attorney’s lien is paramount to the rights of the parties in the suit, and is superior to other liens on the money or property involved, subsequent in point of time.” 7A C.J.S. Attorney & Client § 385 at p. 758 (1980)” In re Willis, 143 B.R. 428 (Bankr. E.D. Tex. 1992). Louisiana law does have a provision specifically for attorney fees interest by way of special privilege, “Louisiana Revised Statute § 37:218(A)” Richards v. Louisiana Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 623 F.3d 241 (5th Cir. 2010).

In most cases, a demand letter sent to the mortgage lender is enough to get results. If the demand letter does not motivate the lender, then filing a lawsuit for not accounting for the payments is our last approach.

If the mortgage lender is complicating matters or the insurance company has denied, delayed, or underpaid your property insurance claim, or call the expert property litigation attorneys at the Chad T. Wilson Law Firm at (832) 415-1432. Maximize your settlement and contact us today! No recovery equals no fee.

snakeoilblog-min

Patrick McGinnis

I have handled bad faith insurance cases all of my 30 years as a trial lawyer, but I predominantly started handling first-party property damage cases in 2005 after Hurricane Rita hit the Beaumont area.  Since then, I have noticed certain claims handling trends are cyclical.  They are popular…they die out…then they come back again as if they were brand new.  I see this most in the area of appraisal.  When I was handling Hurricane Rita cases from about 2006 to 2009, all the public adjusters and policyholder lawyers were invoking appraisal and the insurance companies resisted it fiercely.  By the time I started handling Hurricane Ike cases from about 2009 to 2012 the roles had reversed.  The carriers were routinely invoking appraisal, and those of us representing policyholders were resisting appraisal as much as we could.

There is another aspect of appraisal that I find amusing.  Anytime I go to a roofer conference or public adjuster conference, there is always at least one or two folks there touting that they have a new way (or secret unique way) to go to appraisal and win every time.  It sounds like an ad for one of those “no money down” real estate seminars (“…make millions of dollars for no money down.”).  I find this amusing, not because I am pompous or smug, but because, no matter the cycles, appraisal is always the same.  It is a fairly simple process, the procedures for which are set out in the insurance policy and, aside from a few tweaks of late, that procedure has been the same for years.  There is no trick to appraisal.  Like any process, it has its pros and its cons.  I am the first to say that it is a very good avenue in certain claims (i.e. where causation and scope are fairly well admitted by the carrier and, for the most part, the only issue is pricing).  However, appraisal is not, and has never, been some sort of secret panacea where policyholders can go to get paid full claim value every time.

Here is a typical appraisal clause from a State Farm policy:

Appraisal. If you and we disagree on the value of the property or the amount of loss, either may make a written demand for an appraisal of the loss. In this event, each party will select a competent and impartial appraiser.  Each party will notify the other of the selected appraiser’s identity within 20 days after receipt of the written demand for an appraisal.  The two appraisers will select an umpire. If the appraisers cannot agree upon an umpire within 15 days, either may request that selection be made by a judge of a court having jurisdiction. The appraisers will state separately the value of the property and amount of loss. If they fail to agree, they will submit their differences to the umpire.  A decision agreed to by any two will be binding. Each party will:

  1. Pay its chosen appraiser; and
  2. Bear the other expenses of the appraisal and umpire equally.

If we submit to an appraisal, we will still retain our right to deny the claim.

That last sentence (the one in bold) has been standard in appraisal clause for years.  It can make appraisal very unfair to the policyholder.  Because of that sentence, the carrier can have its cake and eat it too.  The carrier can agree to appraisal with little risk.  Why?  If the award comes back low or to the carrier’s liking, the carrier can accept it, and pay it, and the policyholder is done.  All the policyholder’s legal causes of action are gone.  There is no breach of contract, no bad faith, and no attorney fees.  If there is any interest owed under the Texas Prompt Payment of Claims Act (“TPPCA”), it will be so small that the carrier will compute it and pay that too.

People like to talk about Barbara Technologies[1], which is a great case for policyholders, who have been fighting the claim for a year or two, and then the carrier jumps up and invokes appraisal.  Because of Barbara Technologies, if that happens, the carrier will be on the hook for TPPCA interest and attorney fees.  Another awesome case for policyholders when carriers invoke appraisal late in the process is Hinojos v. State Farm Lloyds[2], a federal case Chad T. Wilson won for all policyholders and their representatives.  Hinojos took Barbara Technologies a step further by holding that even if the carrier makes a partial payment on the claim and then invokes appraisal and pays the claim, the carrier remains liable for Section 542 damages (including attorney fees) because the carrier did not pay the full amount of damages within the time limits in Section 542.

Barbara Technologies and Hinojos are great cases when the carrier invokes appraisal after a lawsuit has been filed (years after the first notice of loss), but people forget that Ortiz[3] was decided by the Texas Supreme Court on the same day as Barbara TechnologiesOrtiz upheld the longstanding law in Texas that when an insurance company pays an appraisal award all the policyholder’s causes of action (except maybe under the Texas Prompt Payment of Claims Act) are dead.  Therefore, if the policyholder invoked appraisal early, but the award comes in low, and the carrier pays it, the policyholder is done.  Neither Barbara Technologies nor Hinojos can save the policyholder in that scenario.  Thus, appraisal can be a great tool for an insurance carrier to cheaply get out of a claim if the award turns out low.  No snake oil can fix that.

Here is the kicker.  If the award is in favor of the policyholder, or is more than the carrier wants to pay, the carrier can simply reject the award (as per the last sentence of the appraisal clause).  What a deal!  It reminds me of a childhood friend who would flip a coin with you and say, “Heads I win and tails you lose.”  Again, there is no secret formula to making an insurance company pay an award it has rejected and refuses to pay.  The only thing the policyholder can do is hire a lawyer, start all over again, and file suit.  While refusal to pay the award might be good evidence of unfair claims handling practices, it comes at a heavy cost to the policyholder.  Setting aside the fact that the appraisal was a waste of time, given typical fees for appraisers and umpires, the policyholder will be several thousand dollars in the hole before he or she ever hires a lawyer.  There is no trick to get back wasted time and wasted money.

Finally, while it may not always be a problem, the appraisal award tends to set the ceiling on actual damages (at least that is what the carriers tend to argue).  I have had cases that were appraised before I got hired, and the award was more than the carrier wanted to pay but was not really a fair amount for actual damages.  (I could have proved more).  However, because the award was done before I was hired, I was stuck with it.  Again, there is no magic solution to fix this problem.

I will say again that there are some instances when appraisal is a good choice, but just like any other choice, one needs to look at the pros and cons and what is in the best interest of the policyholder.  Also, as in real life, there are no “get rich quick” schemes that work in the area of appraisals.  Watch out for anyone trying to sell you on the idea that there are.

Patrick McGinnis, Insurance Claims Attorney for the Chad T. Wilson Law Firm.


[1] Barbara Technologies Corp. v. State Farm Lloyds, 589 S.W.3d 806 (Tex. 2019)

[2] 619 S.W.3d 651 (Tex. 2021)

[3] Ortiz v. State Farm Lloyds, 589 S.W.3d 127 (Tex. 2019)

Homeowners Insurance Claim Victory Exceeds Policy Limits

Homeowners Insurance Claim Victory Exceeds Policy Limits

Policy limits put a cap on how much an insurer has to pay for an insurance claim. Policy limits determine the maximum amount an insurer has to pay and are set at the time the insurance policy is written. Some circumstances invalidate policy limits, such as the insurance company’s actions when handling the claim.

For Ruth, policy limits mean something else. On Memorial Day weekend, 2018, Ruth was sitting on her patio when lightning from a developing storm struck a tree in her yard. The tree split in half and crashed into Ruth’s roof, buckling the rafters and causing extensive roof damage. The rain made its way through the massive holes in the roof, saturating all of her belongings in the home. The tree also took out the powerlines going up to her home leaving the residence without power.

Panicked and devastated, Ruth called her insurance company only to be told she would have to wait until the Tuesday after Memorial Day. The lightning strike occurred on Saturday. This meant she would have to go three days without power in her home.

Living out in the country up in North Houston, Ruth did not see many options and hired her own contractors to remove the tree and tarp the roof. Her friends would lend a hand in moving her belongings out of her house so they could dry. Without electricity to the home, Ruth decided to stay with her mom, albeit for a short time until the property damage could be addressed.

The insurance company began their inspection which ended with them saying they would need an engineer to sufficiently assess the damages. At that time, the insurance company wrote her a check for $20,000. Her insurer did not offer to pay her ALE (Additional Living Expenses) because they were under the false impression that Ruth wanted to stay with her mother.

Ruth ended up staying with her mother for 18 months.

At Ruth’s residence, mold began to grow throughout the house because the house was never adequately dried out after the storm. As time passed the mold got worse. The insurance company hired mold experts to evaluate the mold damage. The mold experts agreed that the mold damage was severe but never followed through. A second check for another $20,000 would arrive unexpectedly and with no indication if it was for the mold damage or not.

Frustrated with the results, Ruth hired a public adjuster to help her situation, but the insurance company would not communicate with this adjuster. Determined to hold her insurer accountable, Ruth turned to us. We in turn filed a lawsuit. During negotiations, we discussed how wrong it was for the insurance company to stall and not offer to pay for Ruth’s living expenses instead of her staying with her mother.

The insurer never offered her assistance, an inventory of contents, or took the effort to address the mold damage. The mold damage may not have been a covered peril, but due to the insurance company’s actions, the mold got worse.

Ruth’s case was resolved before going to trial. Negotiating around policy limits was the main issue. Due to the severity of the mold damage, our client felt her damages exceed her policy limits. What should not have been a total loss ended up that way due to the insurer’s inactions. Through our efforts, Ruth was able to rebuild her life and her home. We are happy to have been able to assist Ruth with her home insurance claim and she is grateful to be able to leave the last year and a half of her life behind her.

If your homeowner’s insurance claim has been denied, delayed, or underpaid, call the expert property litigation attorneys at the Chad T. Wilson Law Firm at (832) 415-1432. Maximize your settlement and contact us today!

 links roof damage to hailstorm activity

Weather Service Report Links Roof Damage to Hailstorm That Insurance Company Claims Never Happened

Paying a high premium on an insurance policy can be a burden most people are familiar with. At some point in everyone’s life, you will need insurance. Whether that’s to pilot a boat, drive a car, or own a home, insurance is meant to financially compensate the policyholder if their property is lost, damaged, or stolen. Insurance companies make their bread and butter off their policyholders and in turn, those policyholders expect a reasonable investigation and fair compensation when they are required to file a claim because their property is damaged or made unusable.

On the night of April 18th, 2020, Montgomery County experienced a powerful wind and hail storm that blanketed the area in 1.2-inch size hail and wind gusts powerful enough to knock down several trees and powerlines throughout the county. Our client’s home endured the storm that evening. The hail damaged portions of our client’s roof and a storage building. The damage to the roof was severe enough that water had penetrated the roof and made its way inside through the ceiling of a utility room near the rear of the home. The hail also damaged gutters and drainage downspouts on the home.

Due to some unforeseen circumstances, some time passed before the claim was reported in March 2021. The insurance company received the claim—as it would any other—and began investigating the incident. As it would turn out, our client had canceled his policy with the insurance company in December 2020, prior to reporting the claim. The policy was canceled because our client ended up going with a different insurance company.

After its investigation, the insurance company denied our client’s claim. The alleged late reporting of the claim and the fact that the client had canceled his policy prior to reporting the claim likely factored into the insurance company’s decision.

Once the case came into our hands, we filed a lawsuit and pressed the insurance company immediately during discovery. During that process, we learned that the insurance company was using a third-party weather data source to pull aggregated data, which showed that the most recent date for sizable hail at our client’s home was 1-inch or larger hail which fell on September 19th, 2019. It seemed clear that the adjuster for the insurance company did not look at any other weather data. As a result of the tunnel vision that this report created, the insurance company then used this date as the actual date of loss.

Conveniently for the insurance company, there was a provision in the insurance policy stating that if the property damage is reported one year or 365 days after the date of loss, the insurance company can deny the claim.

In other words, with this claim the insurance company used favorable weather data from its preferred third-party vendor—apparently without checking other sources—as an excuse to move the date of loss to an earlier date. It then retroactively relied on the late reporting provision in the policy to deny the claim.

Our own investigation into the claim using other weather data sources—including the Severe Weather Data Inventory database provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association, or NOAA—uncovered severe hail in the immediate area of our client’s home on April 18, 2020. This date was within the policy period prior to cancellation and within one year of when the claim was reported, meaning that the late reporting provision did not apply.

When confronted with conflicting data, the insurance company initially stood its ground, believing its weather data as gospel. But our negotiating position had been improved and we were able to steer the case into mediation quickly. In mediation, we were able to get the insurance company to agree to a settlement that was favorable for our client and would allow him to complete the repairs to his home.

We are proud to say this case ended in a good recovery for our client and righted a wrong by the insurance company.

Many disputed wind and hail claims depend heavily on documenting and proving that severe weather impacted an insured’s property on a particular date. Insurance companies will use their own preferred third-party vendors to obtain data as part of their investigation, sometimes even consulting multiple services but only providing the insured with the data that supports the insurance company’s position. Our firm is very familiar with this tactic and frequently resolves cases where these issues are involved.

FREE CASE REVIEW

If your home or business was damaged by a wind or hailstorm and your insurance claim has been denied, delayed, or underpaid, call the expert property litigation attorneys at the Chad T. Wilson Law Firm today. Maximize your settlement and make the insurance company pay.

Federal Courts Adopt the Western District of Louisiana’s Case Management Order

Federal Courts Adopt the Western District of Louisiana’s Case Management Order

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana and the 14th Judicial District Court for the Parish of Calcasieu have adopted a Case Management Order (CMO) that allowed for a streamlined litigation process for insurance claims that arise due to property damage resulting from Hurricanes Laura and/or Delta. The CMO helps produce a just and equitable resolution, enabling the local community to repair or rebuild their homes and businesses after the devastation of the 2020 Hurricane Season. Most Hurricane Laura or Delta property loss claims that give rise to a lawsuit would be subject to this CMO, which provides for an expedited procedural schedule.

The CMO was adopted by the Western District after the Court reviewed the Disaster Litigation Initial Discovery Disaster Protocols recommended by a study committee and adopted by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas following Hurricane Harvey.

The CMO allows for resolution and settlement of lawsuits outside the courthouse walls. Once the answer to your claim is received, the court sets deadlines for initial disclosures, settlement negotiations, and formal mediation, in a matter of weeks or a few months, not years.

After receiving Answer or other responsive pleading:

  • 45 days from the date the defendant files responsive pleadings or 20 days from an order denying a timely motion to remand.

Upon the exchange of Initial Disclosures:

  • Within 15 days. Counsel for both parties shall meet to confer and discuss a mutually convenient time, date, and manner for conference.
  • Within 30 days, the informal settlement conference must be conducted.
  • Counsel for both parties must have full authority to resolve the from their clients.

If the initial settlement conference fails to reach a resolution:

  • Case is set for formal mediation.
  • Both parties complete a Mediation Stipulation form.

If formal mediation fails, the case is set for trial.

Recently, the first Hurricane Laura claim went to trial, and the jury found in favor of a Lake Charles businessman after the jury found that the insurance company acted in bad faith and did not pay timely or fulfill its contractual obligations. Consequently, the insurer must now pay additional penalties, attorney fees, and court costs.

If your home or business is dealing with the fallout of a denied, delayed, or underpaid property insurance claim or your insurer has acted in bad faith, call the Chad T. Wilson Law Firm today. We have obtained millions of dollars in settlements for our Louisiana clients that have had difficulty recovering from their insurance companies for claims related to Hurricanes Laura and Delta. Our expert insurance litigation attorneys know how insurance companies operate and the best way to maximize your settlement.

Cosmetic Damage Exclusions

Cosmetic Damage Exclusions & Property Litigation

Recently proposed property exclusions have created intense debates among agents, adjusters, insurers and insureds. As chaotic weather conditions across the country continue to rise, these exclusions claim to focus on the type of roof damage in an effort to circumvent coverage.  Essentially, what the insurer deems as “cosmetic damage” is excluded from coverage when/if the insurers choose to use this type of endorsement.

That’s where our client, BCD (a family partnership) needed our help. On June 6th, 2018 an intense hailstorm produced wind gusts over 59 miles per hour with massive hail, ultimately destroying windshields, skylights, roofs and other exterior structures on numerous homes and businesses throughout the Dallas area.

The following day, roof leaks began to appear causing water to visibly enter 3 of the 6 commercial properties BCD owns. The businesses impacted by the leaks reached out to their landlord, who promptly filed an insurance claim with Covington Insurance.

After filing the insurance claim with their provider, the insurer sent out an adjuster who reviewed the claim for roof leaks and cited “no damage” to any of the properties. When our clients rebuked the adjuster’s findings, the insurer sent a second adjuster who this time claimed the damage was minimal and fell under the deductible but for only one of the properties. Now befuddled and irritated with their insurance company’s confusing findings, BCD hired their own public adjuster. The insurer responded by sending out an engineer who did recognize the roof damage however he now claimed the damage was merely “cosmetic” in nature.

BCD and their public adjuster recognized what Covington was up to and promptly filed suit. Covington Insurance moved the case to Federal court where both parties were ordered to participate in an early mediation. At mediation, the case settled for more than 200 times the original under-deductible estimate written by Covington. Not only was our client delighted, but the public adjuster who they hired attended mediation and was also relieved to see the insured be fully indemnified. Now our client’s tenants could go back to running their businesses without the constant threat of interior leaks and roof damage disrupting their business operations.

A cosmetic damage exclusion means damage to external surfaces, including walls, roofs, doors, and windows that allegedly only impact the appearance (but not the functional purpose) may not be covered under the policy. These are things insurers consider ornamental or cosmetic and are usually very vaguely defined so that the insurer can tailor the damage as one being “merely cosmetic” to deny the claim.

Just because you have a cosmetic damage exclusion does not mean you are out of luck with your insurance claim. Our expert insurance litigation attorneys know how insurance companies operate and the tactics they employ to delay, deny, or underpay your property insurance claim. Our consultations are free, and you owe us nothing until we win your case. Contact us today.

Take Your Time When Purchasing Property Insurance
Why It’s Important To Take Your Time When Purchasing Property Insurance

When you see a doctor, you expect that they will take their time to do their job and understand the need for your visit. When investing money in a business opportunity, you would want to review all available information to make the best decision for your money. The same may be said when taking your car into the shop. When purchasing a service, the reason for your visit is more important than how fast you get the service. Learn how to make your property insurance purchase a smooth transaction.

More insurance carriers are making it easier for first-time homeowners to get home insurance. Obtaining property insurance expeditiously is important. Larger insurance companies can move quickly when it comes to purchasing insurance and smaller insurance companies are following the trend. What is the best insurance and what can you do to avoid making a mistake when purchasing it?

Choosing the Right Coverage

The most important thing in any business is to provide excellent customer service. This includes ensuring that the policyholder has all necessary coverages and not just encouraging them with products they will never use or be able to afford.

When an insurance provider rushes through the purchasing process without thoroughly understanding their customer’s needs, they’re harming not only themselves but also other parties involved in this transaction. By focusing on profits instead of getting to know your clientele and what coverages are needed for them – you hurt everyone who has been relying upon these policies!

A company should never sacrifice its morals just because it wants more customers or greater profit margins; doing so will only come back around at some point anyway with negative consequences that could’ve easily been avoided by taking care beforehand.

Homeowner’s insurance or any type of insurance for that matter is a serious subject. Inadequate coverage can result in financial catastrophe. Insurance companies are in the business of making money, they cannot increase their profits if they roll over and pay every insurance claim. Viewing insurance as a simple means to make money is wrong. People need insurance. People need to be protected.

Choosing the right coverage goes hand in hand with finding the right agent for you and your needs. Insurance can be a confusing topic for the average person, but there are ways to find affordable coverage. Your agent is someone you should contact if anything happens with your policy – they’re in the know and will help make sure that nothing gets left uncovered or unpaid!

Filing a Claim

When filing a claim, customers want to know that their insurer will be able to provide tangible evidence of coverage. We need this assurance before putting any money at risk and without it, we feel uncertain about what kind or how much help is available for an event that has occurred while using their product/service.

If you do not have the right insurance, you could find yourself in a significant financial hole. A thoughtful conversation with an insurance agent can help you avoid these errors.

Take Your Time to Find the Right Agent

Good Insurance agents often face a challenging environment where they must balance the needs of their customers with those companies. Insurance leaders who put profit ahead of customer service will struggle in this competitive market, as knowledgeable and trustworthy professionals like insurance brokers can provide better quality products for clients.

Insurance agents are often expected to spend very little time with their customers, but the best ones understand that every second counts. They know it’s not just about making sales or finding new clients; they need customer input and guidance so insurance products can be tailored specifically for them – which is why we find this situation ironic!

The bottom line is you need to take this important purchase seriously and find an agent that takes the time to find YOU out what you need.

If your property insurance claim has been denied, delayed, or underpaid, contact the expert insurance attorneys with the Chad T. Wilson Law Firm at (833)942-0678 or email us at [email protected].

1 5 6 7 8 9 13